{"id":10758,"date":"2006-05-10T07:00:31","date_gmt":"2006-05-10T05:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/i-medici-promuovono-gli-informatori-2\/"},"modified":"2006-05-10T07:00:31","modified_gmt":"2006-05-10T05:00:31","slug":"i-medici-promuovono-gli-informatori-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/i-medici-promuovono-gli-informatori-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Doctors promote Whistleblowers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><span class=\"Style_3\">Family doctors promote, but not with full marks, the quality of the information received from drug sales representatives. Out of a general score from 0 to 100, the average &#039;appreciation&#039; is 67, with higher marks on the completeness (69) and on the usefulness and usability of the data and news provided (67), while a lower &#039;vote&#039; is given by the &#039;white coats&#039; to credibility: the score stops at 63. <br \/>This is what emerges from a survey conducted on a sample of 310 family doctors by the Medical Pharmacology Unit of the University of Verona, in collaboration with the Smith Kline Foundation, presented in Rome at the conference on<span class=\"Style_6\"> \u201cScientific information on the new drug scene<\/span>ri\u201d, organized by the magazine <span class=\"Style_6\">&#039;Political economy of drugs&#039;.<\/span> In the light of the results emerging from the survey, the authors launch a proposal. &quot;Although limited to a small sample - they comment - the survey has shown that it is possible to monitor the quality of scientific information&quot;. Hence the proposal <span class=\"Style_6\">\u201ccreate an independent national observatory on scientific drug information, promoted by institutions, industry, medical associations and <br \/>other interested operators, citizens and patients&quot;.<\/span><\/span><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I medici di famiglia promuovono, ma non a pieni voti, la qualit&#224; delle informazioni ricevute dagli informatori scientifici del farmaco. Su un punteggio generale da 0 a100, la media di &#8216;gradimento&#8217; &#232; di 67, con voti pi&#249; alti sulla completezza (69) e sull&#8217;utilit&#224; e utilizzabilit&#224; dei dati e delle notizie fornite (67), mentre un &#8216;voto&#8217; &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10758\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}