{"id":14085,"date":"2011-09-04T02:30:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-04T00:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/il-governo-liberale-mette-il-numero-chiuso-alle-farmacie\/"},"modified":"2011-09-04T02:30:00","modified_gmt":"2011-09-04T00:30:00","slug":"il-governo-liberale-mette-il-numero-chiuso-alle-farmacie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/il-governo-liberale-mette-il-numero-chiuso-alle-farmacie\/","title":{"rendered":"The liberal government puts a limited number on pharmacies"},"content":{"rendered":"

September 3, 2011<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Among some criticisms, the PdL amendment was approved in the Senate Budget Committee<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Green light for a law that maintains the 'limited number' of pharmacies. An amendment to the maneuver (to the article on liberalizations) was approved by the Senate Budget Committee, which clarifies the need to maintain "the limitation on the number of persons entitled to exercise a profession" for professions "connected to human health '.
FREE MARKET? NO -<\/strong> If the health sector "were abandoned to the free market - reads the report accompanying the amendment - the logics that would govern the dislocation of these services would no longer be those of easy accessibility, capillarity and universality of the service but only those of economic convenience\u201d. <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

CRITICISM <\/font><\/ins><\/span><\/span><\/strong>\u2013 The amendment, presented by the PDL, has created contrasts within the majority, which voted for it together but with the 'criticism' from Forza Sud, because there had not been a prior discussion on the proposed modification norm.<\/font><\/ins><\/span> (Adnkronos)<\/ins><\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

3 settembre 2011 Tra qualche critica approvato in commissione Bilancio al Senato l’emendamento del PdL Via libera a una norma che mantiene il ‘numero chiuso’ delle farmacie. E’ stato approvato un emendamento alla manovra (all’articolo sulle liberalizzazioni), in commissione Bilancio al Senato, che chiarisce la necessita’ di mantenere ‘la limitazione del numero di persone titolate …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14085\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}