{"id":14648,"date":"2012-03-01T06:30:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-01T05:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/liberalizzazioni-sui-generici-passa-la-modifica-che-piace-ai-medici\/"},"modified":"2012-03-01T06:30:00","modified_gmt":"2012-03-01T05:30:00","slug":"liberalizzazioni-sui-generici-passa-la-modifica-che-piace-ai-medici","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/liberalizzazioni-sui-generici-passa-la-modifica-che-piace-ai-medici\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberalizations, the change that doctors like passes on generics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Doctors are no longer obliged to write on the prescription that the prescribed drug can eventually be replaced with an equivalent alternative. From article 11 of the liberalization decree, currently being examined by the Senate for the first parliamentary yes, the passage that in recent weeks had raised strong resentment among family doctors has in fact disappeared. The reminder remains for prescribers to remind patients of the savings that can sometimes be obtained thanks to generics, but it is an indication that remains exclusively verbal.<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

It is unlikely that the provision will undergo adjustments during the parliamentary process (at the time of writing there is talk of a probable trust on the part of the Government) and therefore the comments of the category acronyms can count on a sufficient margin of certainty. \u00abThe new text certainly represents a step forward\u00bb is the opinion of Giacomo Milillo, national secretary of the Fimmg \u00abwe rediscover the commitment undertaken in recent days by Minister Balduzzi to meet our requests. Also positive is the fact that the paragraph further strengthens the principle according to which substitution is possible only if there is the patient's consent, while otherwise the prescribed product must be given\u00bb.<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

Satisfaction also at Snami: \u00abIt is our victory\u00bb says the president of the union, Angelo Testa \u00aban obligation that would have only caused useless inconvenience to citizens has been set aside\u00bb.<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

Positive comments also on another novelty of article 11, the one that delegates AIFA to evaluate optimal or single-dose packages "according to the pathologies to be treated". \u00abI don't think there are many pathologies for which tailor-made packs would be needed\u00bb is Milillo's opinion \u00abbut returning periodically to the topic to check the situation never hurts\u00bb. \u00abWe have been asking for single-dose packs for some time\u00bb says Testa \u00abor alternatively that the pharmacist be allowed to repackage according to the therapeutic need of the moment\u00bb<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

March 1, 2012 \u2013 DoctorNews<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

Organic plant, from article 11 an incomprehensible mess<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Distance and quorum remain, but what happens to the Organic Plant? With the liberalization decree being examined by the Senate for the first parliamentary yes, the reflections of the "day after" focus above all on letter c, paragraph 1 of article 11, as "baked out" on Tuesday evening by the Senate Industry Commission. Fault of the readings that on the paragraph (with which article 2 of 475\/68 is fully rewritten) have flourished in the last 24 hours: in a communiqu\u00e9 released by the Pd, for example, explicitly indicates "the suppression of the organic plant" among the positive notes of the text mediated with the Pdl. And the same considerations come from the Anpi, promoter in the past weeks of a proposal that seems ri<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I medici non sono più obbligati a scrivere sulla ricetta che il farmaco prescritto può essere eventualmente sostituito con un’alternativa equivalente. Dall’articolo 11 del decreto liberalizzazioni, attualmente all’esame del Senato per il primo sì parlamentare, è infatti sparito il passaggio che nelle settimane scorse aveva sollevato forte risentimento tra i medici di famiglia. Resta il …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}