{"id":14810,"date":"2012-04-26T03:30:00","date_gmt":"2012-04-26T01:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/reputazione-fra-pazienti-industria-dispositivi-batte-farmaceutica\/"},"modified":"2012-04-26T03:30:00","modified_gmt":"2012-04-26T01:30:00","slug":"reputazione-fra-pazienti-industria-dispositivi-batte-farmaceutica","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/reputazione-fra-pazienti-industria-dispositivi-batte-farmaceutica\/","title":{"rendered":"Reputation among patients, device industry beats pharmaceuticals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-autospace: ; mso-layout-grid-align: none\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-family: BookAntiqua; color: #212120; mso-bidi-font-family: BookAntiqua\"><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Calibri\">The medical device industry has a &quot;good&quot; or &quot;excellent&quot; reputation according to 52% of patient groups responding to a new PatientView survey, according to which only 40% shares the same opinion about pharmaceutical companies.<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-autospace: ; mso-layout-grid-align: none\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-family: BookAntiqua; color: #212120; mso-bidi-font-family: BookAntiqua\"><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Calibri\">This rate of approval of device companies by patients and their associations places them second only to pharmacies, assures the study of 300 patient groups from 42 countries around the world. However, the report, which defines &#039;corporate reputation&#039; as the extent to which companies are responding to patient expectations, reveals that only 33% of patient groups believe the medical device industry&#039;s reputation has improved over the past five years. while 32% says it has declined over the same period. Respondents 64% also said that the level of innovation in the device industry is &quot;good&quot; or &quot;excellent&quot; and 57% believes this improves patient safety. <\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-autospace: ; mso-layout-grid-align: none\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-family: BookAntiqua; color: #212120; mso-bidi-font-family: BookAntiqua\"><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Calibri\">As for other measures of industry performance, 32% patient organizations practice ethical marketing, 30% are transparent with external healthcare stakeholders, and 22% adopt fair pricing.<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; text-autospace: ; mso-layout-grid-align: none\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"font-family: BookAntiqua; color: #212120; mso-bidi-font-family: BookAntiqua\"><font size=\"3\"><font face=\"Calibri\">The survey also examines which individual companies in the industry have the best corporate reputation from a patient perspective: the winner is Coloplast, followed by Medtronic, Smith &amp; Nephew, Roche Diagnostics, Abbott and Johnson &amp; Johnson.<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt\" class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: #212120; font-size: 9.5pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold\">April 26, 2012 \u2013 Barbara Di Chiara \u2013 PharmaKronos<\/span><\/em><span style=\"line-height: 115%; font-size: 9pt\"><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&#8217;industria dei dispositivi medici ha una reputazione &quot;buona&quot; o &quot;eccellente&quot; secondo il 52% dei gruppi di pazienti che hanno risposto a una nuova indagine di PatientView, secondo la quale solo il 40% esprime lo stesso parere sulle aziende farmaceutiche. Questa percentuale di approvazione nei confronti delle imprese produttrici di dispositivi da parte dei pazienti e &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14810\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}