{"id":15274,"date":"2012-08-30T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-08-30T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/decreto-balduzzi-ecco-il-testo-delle-polemiche\/"},"modified":"2012-08-30T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-08-30T07:00:00","slug":"decreto-balduzzi-ecco-il-testo-delle-polemiche","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/decreto-balduzzi-ecco-il-testo-delle-polemiche\/","title":{"rendered":"Balduzzi decree. Here is the text of the controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"

We publish the new draft<\/span><\/a> of the "Decretone" Sanit\u00e0 in the latest version presented yesterday to the pre-council and which he met several objections <\/span><\/a>by the other ministers. In bold, in the new text, the changes with respect to draft of 10 August.<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

29 AUG<\/span><\/b> <\/span>\u2013 On the eve of the new meeting at Palazzo Chigi to evaluate whether to fully postpone or "unpack" the decree of the Minister of Health Balduzzi, we are publishing the text of the latest draft presented to yesterday's pre-council of ministers. As is known, during yesterday's meeting the ministers asked for many clarifications and insights. In fact, strong doubts about the form, merit and coverage of the provision developed by the Minister of Health, whose launch was expected for next Friday, would have emerged.<\/p>\n

Not much is known about the nature of these doubts, but it seems clear that as it stands, with its 27 articles dealing with even more topics within them, it will be really difficult to pass everything through the emergency decree, even if linked , as stated in the title of the draft, to "development" (and therefore theoretically to the homonymous Passera package).<\/p>\n

The knots, however, should be resolved tomorrow, during the new meeting of ministers.
<\/font><\/span>
<\/span>August 29, 2012 Pubblichiamo la nuova bozza del “Decretone” Sanità nell’ultima versione presentata ieri al preconsiglio e che ha incontrato diverse obiezioni da parte degli altri ministri. In neretto, nel nuovo testo, le modifiche rispetto alla bozza del 10 agosto. 29 AGO – Alla vigilia del nuovo incontro a Palazzo Chigi per valutare se rinviare in toto o …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15274\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}