{"id":16695,"date":"2013-06-05T02:30:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-05T00:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/studi-di-settore-farmacisti-rendite-al-top\/"},"modified":"2013-06-05T02:30:00","modified_gmt":"2013-06-05T00:30:00","slug":"studi-di-settore-farmacisti-rendite-al-top","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/studi-di-settore-farmacisti-rendite-al-top\/","title":{"rendered":"Sector studies, top income pharmacists"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

The figure emerges from sector studies, the latest just elaborated which are based on the 2012 tax returns on the 2011 tax year: pharmacists, together with notaries, are the ones who pay the most taxes. If, in fact, in 2012 the average income of professionals, who support the average income in sector studies, is 49,900 euros, with a +0.8% compared to the previous year, pharmacies are at the top with 103,400 euros. A figure seized on the fly by the representatives of the parapharmacies and by the president's voice Joseph Scioscia <\/b>they speak of \u00abthe paradoxical perseverance of Italian politics in wanting to protect certain income from positions that are no longer sustainable. We have nothing against the top incomes of pharmacies\u00bb, explains Scioscia. \u00abIt is rather the closure of the category to any form of liberalization of the drug system that is suspicious: an all too obvious attempt not to want to see even one iota of its market share scratched. A resistance that is frankly no longer sustainable\u00bb he concludes.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

5 June 2013 \u2013 Pharmacist33<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

  Il dato emerge dagli studi di settore, gli ultimi appena elaborati che si basano sulle dichiarazioni dei redditi 2012 sull’anno di imposta 2011: i farmacisti, insieme ai notai, sono quelli che pagano più tasse. Se, infatti, nel 2012 il reddito medio dei professionisti, che sostengono la media dei redditi negli studi di settore, è di …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fedaiisf-archivio-storico"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16695"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16695\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}