{"id":25704,"date":"2016-04-26T10:47:07","date_gmt":"2016-04-26T08:47:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/?p=25704"},"modified":"2016-04-26T13:15:31","modified_gmt":"2016-04-26T11:15:31","slug":"intesa-stato-regioni-a-farmaceutica-territoriale-125-miliardi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/intesa-stato-regioni-a-farmaceutica-territoriale-125-miliardi\/","title":{"rendered":"State-Regions agreement, a territorial pharmaceutical 12.5 billion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/sanita-sprechi--e1429791961167-300x189.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/>It amounts to 12.5 billion euros, about 200 million more than in 2015<\/strong>, the budget for this year&#039;s regional pharmaceutical expenditure. It is what can be deduced <a href=\"http:\/\/www.regioni.it\/download\/news\/455420\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">by the State-Regions agreement<\/a> on the proposal of the Ministry of Health for the allocation of the National Health Fund 2016: traced on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federfarma.it\/Edicola\/Filodiretto\/VediNotizia.aspx?id=11497\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pattern<\/a> signed in February by the presidents of the Regions, the agreement &quot;spreads&quot; the 108.2 billion (out of 111) that make up the so-called &quot;indistinct fund&quot; of the NHS on levels and sub-levels of assistance. Result: 5.4 billion goes to prevention, 47.6 to hospital care and just over 55 billion to district assistance. The latter item is broken down in turn into territorial assistance (which accounts for almost 20.7 billion), general medicine (which receives 7.5 billion), specialist medicine (14.3 billion) and pharmaceutical assistance (12.5 billion, as mentioned).<\/p>\n<p><strong>As far as pharmaceuticals are concerned, which includes agreed and direct\/dpc expenditure<\/strong>, the division also specifies the ceilings assigned to the individual Regions (see table below): compared to 2015, the highest increases in absolute values go to Lombardy (about 24 million more this year), Lazio (14 million), Campania ( 13.5 million) and Sicily (12 million more); in reality, however, the allotment does not impose inequalities on anyone because all the Regions obtain increases over the previous year between 1.15 and 1.17%, in line with the average increase at national level. (AS)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Territorial pharmaceuticals, regional ceilings<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<table style=\"height: 673px;\" border=\"0\" width=\"686\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><strong>Budget 2016<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Budget 2015<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Piedmont<\/td>\n<td>931.427.791<\/td>\n<td>920.564.082<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Val d&#039;Aosta<\/td>\n<td>26.633.029<\/td>\n<td>26.322.395<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lombardy<\/td>\n<td>2.059.490.889<\/td>\n<td>2.035.470.101<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Bozen<\/td>\n<td>104.306.684<\/td>\n<td>103.090.112<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Trent<\/td>\n<td>109.800.161<\/td>\n<td>108.519.513<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Veneto<\/td>\n<td>1.015.573.901<\/td>\n<td>1.003.728.795<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Friuli VG<\/td>\n<td>259.450.387<\/td>\n<td>256.424.285<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Liguria<\/td>\n<td>342.273.138<\/td>\n<td>338.281.018<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Emilia R.<\/td>\n<td>929.843.102<\/td>\n<td>918.997.889<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tuscany<\/td>\n<td>791.272.126<\/td>\n<td>782.043.121<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Umbria<\/td>\n<td>188.315.859<\/td>\n<td>186.149.437<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Brands<\/td>\n<td>324.606.220<\/td>\n<td>320.820.179<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lazio<\/td>\n<td>1.205.919.868<\/td>\n<td>1.191.851.720<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Abruzzo<\/td>\n<td>276.538.746<\/td>\n<td>273.313.343<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Molise<\/td>\n<td>65.495.788<\/td>\n<td>64.731.879<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Campania<\/td>\n<td>1.164.906.613<\/td>\n<td>1.151.319.853<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Puglia<\/td>\n<td>832.408.581<\/td>\n<td>822.699.836<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Basilicata<\/td>\n<td>118.879.376<\/td>\n<td>117.492.831<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Calabria<\/td>\n<td>402.123.928<\/td>\n<td>397.433.781<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sicily<\/td>\n<td>1.031.297.606<\/td>\n<td>1.019.269.142<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sardinia<\/td>\n<td>343.552.073<\/td>\n<td>339.545.065<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>12.524.112.867<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>12.378.038.374<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federfarma.it\/Edicola\/Ultime-notizie\/23-04-2016-06-43-25.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">23\/04\/2016 \u2013 Federfarma<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Related news:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rifday.it\/2016\/04\/26\/farmindustria-no-alla-revisione-dei-tetti-spesa-proposta-regioni\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Farmindustria: &quot;No to the revision of the expenditure ceilings proposed by the Regions&quot;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p id=\"art15152\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.regioni.it\/newsletter\/n-2925\/del-19-04-2016\/piano-sanitario-nazionale-2016-richieste-per-intesa-su-quote-vincolate-15152\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2016 National Health Plan: requests for agreement on restricted quotas<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" title=\"Approved Document - 2016 NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN: AGREEMENT ON CIPE RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATION TO THE REGIONS OF THE QUOTAS BOUND BY OBJECTIVES\" href=\"http:\/\/www.regioni.it\/download\/conferenze\/454043\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">approved document \u2013 NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN 2016: AGREEMENT ON CIPE RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATION OF THE REGIONS OF THE QUOTAS BOUND BY OBJECTIVES<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ammonta a 12,5 miliardi di euro, circa 200 milioni in pi\u00f9 rispetto al 2015, il budget per la spesa farmaceutica territoriale di quest\u2019anno. E\u2019 quanto si deduce dall\u2019intesa Stato-Regioni sulla proposta del ministero della Salute per il riparto del Fondo sanitario nazionale 2016: ricalcato sullo schema sottoscritto a febbraio dai presidenti delle Regioni, l\u2019accordo \u201cspalma\u201d &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":903,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[26,79],"class_list":["post-25704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-notizie","tag-spesa-farmaceutica","tag-ssn"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25704\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}