{"id":35471,"date":"2018-04-06T11:13:14","date_gmt":"2018-04-06T09:13:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/?p=35471"},"modified":"2018-04-06T11:21:04","modified_gmt":"2018-04-06T09:21:04","slug":"la-reputazione-di-big-pharma-migliora-ecco-la-top-ten-delle-aziende","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/la-reputazione-di-big-pharma-migliora-ecco-la-top-ten-delle-aziende\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Pharma&#039;s reputation improves: here are the top ten companies"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"site-block__title\">Big Pharma&#039;s reputation improves: here are the top ten companies<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/blog\/2018\/04\/05\/la-reputazione-di-big-pharma\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Aboutpharma \u2013 April 6, 2018<\/a><\/p>\n<figure><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-300x185.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-300x185.png 300w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-398x245.png 398w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-197x121.png 197w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-143x88.png 143w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-110x68.png 110w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-195x120.png 195w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-210x129.png 210w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-147x90.png 147w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-240x148.png 240w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-150x92.png 150w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558-500x308.png 500w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/reputation-e1522919268558.png 650w\" alt=\"la reputazione di big pharma\" width=\"300\" height=\"185\" \/><\/figure>\n<p>Improve the reputation of pharmaceutical companies globally. At least according to the latest report from the British research firm <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patient-view.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">patient view,<\/a> which questioned 1,330 patient associations around the world. In 2017, 43% of the groups interviewed judged Big Pharma&#039;s reputation as &quot;excellent&quot; or &quot;good&quot;, against 38% in 2016. At the top of the ranking, which includes 46 companies, we find two confirmations: <strong>VII Healthcare<\/strong> And <strong>Abbvie<\/strong>in first and second place respectively. On the third step, however, he arrives<strong> Gilead<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2>The reputation of Big Pharma<\/h2>\n<p>The survey, carried out between November 2017 and February 2018, evaluates the reputation of 46 pharmaceutical companies in relation to 12 key indicators, including integrity, transparency (on pricing policies, funding for stakeholders, clinical studies), patient centrality, ability to innovate and offer useful or high quality products.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the patient groups surveyed ranked the pharmaceutical sector third in terms of overall reputation out of nine healthcare domains, namely biotechnology, generics, health insurance, medical devices, private healthcare and pharmacies. In 2016, Big Pharma&#039;s reputation ranked fifth.<\/p>\n<h2>The top ten<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-479725\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 280px) 100vw, 280px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten.jpg 280w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-269x252.jpg 269w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-134x125.jpg 134w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-102x95.jpg 102w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-110x103.jpg 110w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-156x146.jpg 156w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-210x197.jpg 210w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-147x138.jpg 147w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-240x225.jpg 240w, https:\/\/www.aboutpharma.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/top-ten-150x140.jpg 150w\" alt=\"la reputazione di big pharma\" width=\"280\" height=\"262\" \/><\/a>The Patien View ranking is based on responses from patient groups who report &quot;familiarity&quot; with the companies being researched. ViiV Healhtcare, also first this year, is at the top in almost all indicators (11 out of 12). Abbvie, on the second step of the podium, conquers the maximum evaluation in half of the indicators. Gilead, in third place, gains two positions compared to 2016. Novartis is in fourth place, followed by Janssen, Roche, Lundbeck, Ucb, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer.<\/p>\n<h2>The net promotion score<\/h2>\n<p>For the first time, Patient View introduced a question on the &quot;net promoter score (NPS)&quot; in the survey: patient groups that collaborated with companies were asked if they would recommend them to other patient groups. The highest scores were reported (in rank order) by these companies: Lundbeck, Ucb, Roche, ViiV Healthcare, Leo Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie and Grifols.<\/p>\n<p>Related news:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/createsend.com\/t\/j-994832053F86E8CD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span class=\"font-roboto\">The Corporate Reputation of Pharma Companies, 2016: from the Perspective of 75 Italian Patient Groups<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/pharma-la-via-usa-aumentare-la-reputazione-solo-9-degli-americani-crede-le-aziende-farmaceutiche-mettano-pazienti-dei-profitti\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pharma: the US way to increase reputation<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/cala-la-reputazione-big-pharma-si-puo-migliorare\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Big Pharma&#039;s reputation declines, but it can be improved<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La reputazione di Big Pharma migliora: ecco la top ten delle aziende Aboutpharma &#8211; 6 aprile 2018 Migliora la reputazione delle aziende farmaceutiche a livello globale. Almeno secondo l\u2019ultimo rapporto della societ\u00e0 di ricerca britannica Patient View, che ha interpellato 1.330 associazioni di pazienti in tutto il mondo. Nel 2017 il 43% dei gruppi intervistati &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":35474,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[47],"class_list":["post-35471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-notizie","tag-big-pharma"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35471\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}