{"id":49482,"date":"2020-04-22T13:37:58","date_gmt":"2020-04-22T11:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/?p=49482"},"modified":"2020-04-22T13:37:58","modified_gmt":"2020-04-22T11:37:58","slug":"le-citta-italiane-meglio-attrezzate-per-ripartire-con-la-fase-2-secondo-ey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/le-citta-italiane-meglio-attrezzate-per-ripartire-con-la-fase-2-secondo-ey\/","title":{"rendered":"The Italian cities best equipped to restart with Phase 2, according to EY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The consultancy firm EY, <b>crossing <\/b>The <b>resilience indicators<\/b> of its Smart City Index (<b>health, economic and social factors)<\/b> with the data of the Covid-19 contagion, he analyzed <b>how much the Italian capitals are ready to restart and face the post-emergency phase 2.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>According to EY, more than 20% of the Italian capitals<\/b> he won&#039;t be in a position to leave immediately, but he will have a lot of effort, because <b>it does not have the infrastructure and technologies suitable for dealing with the complexity of the restart.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Mappa-fase-2-ipotesi.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-49484 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Mappa-fase-2-ipotesi.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"418\" height=\"315\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Mappa-fase-2-ipotesi.jpeg 696w, https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/Mappa-fase-2-ipotesi-300x226.jpeg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 418px) 100vw, 418px\" \/><\/a>Based on the spread of the infection to date, EY has ranked the cities following<\/b> 4 restart clusters, <b>easy, slow, slow and critical<\/b>:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\">\n<li class=\"li1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Easy restart (low contagion\/good resilience)<\/b>: these are the cities (mainly in the Center and in the South) where <b>take advantage of<\/b> <b>restart is easier<\/b>, because they have ready-made infrastructure and technologies, and can better control the few infections on their territory. Between these: <b>Cagliari<\/b>, <b>Bari <\/b>And<b> Lecce<\/b>, but also some medium-sized cities in the central-north, such as <b>Siena, Pisa, Pordenone, Udine<\/b>. Also ranked <b>Cosenza, Perugia, Potenza, Livorno and Sassari<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\">\n<li class=\"li1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Slow restart (low contagion\/poor resilience)<\/b>: are cities where the <b>restart could happen very soon<\/b>, given the low level of contagion, <b>but more slowly<\/b>, because their mobility and communication infrastructures are not of a high level and do not allow great performances<b>the<\/b>oni. Many of the South: <b>Caltanissetta, Caserta, Crotone,<\/b> but also some from Central Italy such as <b>Viterbo<\/b> And <b>The Eagle<\/b>. Also ranked <b>Prato, Rome, Naples, Catania and Palermo<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\">\n<li class=\"li1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Slow restart (high contagion\/good resilience)<\/b>: these are the traditionally \u201csmart\u201d cities of the North, such as <b>Milan, Bergamo, Brescia, Piacenza,<\/b> etc., which, despite having very advanced mobility systems, TLC networks and sensor networks, appear <b>brake when restarting<\/b> by high levels of contagion (often correlated to high levels of hospitalization and shortage of general practitioners in the area). Also ranked <b>Venice, Turin, Florence, Genoa, Parma, Bologna, Padua, Pavia and Trento<\/b>;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ul1\">\n<li class=\"li1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Critical restart (high contagion\/low resilience)<\/b>: are the cities where <b>the restart appears more critical<\/b>, because alongside very high contagion situations, very low levels of resilience are combined (not very widespread public transport networks and low presence of car sharing, limited TLC coverage, few sensors in the area and lack of platforms and control centers where to collect data ). They are cities like<b> Cremona, Lodi, Lecco, Alessandria, Verbania,<\/b> rarely at the top of the classifications of Italian smart cities, where the levers of modern infrastructure and advanced technologies seem to be lacking to be able to recover promptly. Also ranked <b>Savona, Bolzano, Forl\u00ec, Varese, Belluno, Ancona and Como<\/b>.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.it\/2020\/04\/21\/coronavirus-italia-fase-2-citta-italiane-meglio-attrezzate-per-ripartire-secondo-ey\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Forbes \u2013 21 talks 2020<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La societ\u00e0 di consulenza EY, incrociando gli indicatori di resilienza del suo Smart City Index (fattori sanitari, economici e sociali) con i dati del contagio Covid-19, ha analizzato quanto i capoluoghi italiani sono pronti a ripartire e ad affrontare la fase 2 post emergenza. Secondo EY, pi\u00f9 del 20% dei capoluoghi italiani non sar\u00e0 in &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":49486,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-notizie"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49482\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}