{"id":6793,"date":"2014-12-27T19:09:41","date_gmt":"2014-12-27T18:09:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/?p=6793"},"modified":"2015-01-05T10:56:50","modified_gmt":"2015-01-05T09:56:50","slug":"governo-matteo-renzi-depenalizzati-112-reati-quali-sono-mezze-verita-e-bufale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/governo-matteo-renzi-depenalizzati-112-reati-quali-sono-mezze-verita-e-bufale\/","title":{"rendered":"Matteo Renzi government: decriminalized 112 crimes, what are they? Truths, half-truths and hoaxes."},"content":{"rendered":"

Selling expired drugs<\/strong>\u00a0and toxic foods are no longer condemnable by law. The list of some of the 112 crimes decriminalized by the Matteo Renzi government, let's see what will happen in Italy. As often happens, on the "decriminalization" of crimes carried out by the Government we read confused news, half-truths and hoaxes in industrial quantities. Let's try to clarify a bit.<\/p>\n

December 27, 2014 \u2013 POLITICS<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"L'New Year<\/strong>\u00a0it should be for each of us hope, the expectation of a better future and the end of the crisis, i.e. the crisis in work, in consumption, in short, that period where the economy is falling apart. Our country is now known for its continuous tax changes,\u00a0on laws in general<\/a>, but they don't always improve our lifestyle, indeed most of the time it seems that theItaly<\/strong>\u00a0take a step back in comparison to other European countries. The\u00a0Renzi government<\/strong>\u00a0thought well of\u00a0decriminalize 112 offences<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0to limit the burden on Italian justice, but on the part of citizens and public security agents, disappointment and bitterness take over.<\/p>\n

THE\u00a0decriminalized crimes<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Renzi government<\/strong>\u00a0are considered\u00a0minors<\/strong>, but let's keep in mind that they significantly affect people's everyday life and the fact that they become non-prosecutable by law will cause that feeling of protection to fall among honest citizens, while it will give greater certainty of not being punished to those accustomed to to commit crimes. The fact is that it is not possible to consider\u00a0minor crimes<\/strong>\u00a0the\u00a0stalking<\/strong>, the\u00a0fraud<\/strong>, L'manslaughter<\/strong>\u00a0and many more, but let's see together some of the\u00a0crimes decriminalized by<\/strong>\u00a0Government<\/strong>\u00a0Renzi<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\"\"List of decriminalized crimes<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is a decriminalized crime\u00a0abandon children or people with disabilities<\/strong>. The\u00a0stalking<\/strong>\u00a0(look down<\/em>) according to\u00a0Renzi government<\/strong>\u00a0is no longer prosecutable by law.\u00a0Corrupt a minor<\/strong>\u00a0it has become a decriminalized crime.\u00a0Selling expired drugs<\/strong>\u00a0and toxic foods are no longer condemnable by law. They are no longer penalized by the lawobscene acts<\/strong>\u00a0in public place. It is no longer considered a reprehensible offense by lawobstruction of justice<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Conceal a corpse<\/strong>\u00a0it is not considered a crime punishable by law<\/a>. The crime of has been decriminalized\u00a0manslaughter<\/strong>; L'failure to help<\/strong>\u00a0and theomission \"\"of reports<\/strong>\u00a0they are no longer subject to condemnation. The\u00a0domestic violence<\/strong>\u00a0are decriminalized crimes.\u00a0Outrageous acts\u00a0<\/strong>towards a niche and towards a\u00a0lifeless body<\/strong>\u00a0they are no longer liable to prosecution by law; the fact of committing a\u00a0theft<\/strong>\u00a0it is not enforceable by law.\u00a0Defame\u00a0<\/strong>people is no longer punishable by law;\u00a0To gamble<\/strong>\u00a0he is no longer subject to condemnation.<\/p>\n

These are just some of the\u00a0decriminalized crimes<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Renzi government<\/strong>\u00a0and according to what the\u00a0Premier<\/strong>, The\u00a0animal abuse<\/strong>\u00a0will not be legitimized. Meanwhile, the Italian Federation for Animal and Environmental Rights had proclaimed a\u00a0manifestation<\/strong>\u00a0scheduled for Saturday, January 24, 2015, to counter the provision of the law\u00a0Matteo<\/strong>\u00a0Renzi<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Note: The Law Delegate to the Government on Decriminalization<\/a><\/p>\n

Related news<\/strong>:\u00a0Nursing crimes decriminalized by the Renzi government<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h4>\n

It is no longer considered serious to administer faulty or imperfect medicines. The foreseen fine, if it does not cause damage to the patient, is a maximum of 103 euros and the acquittal is guaranteed because the art. 131bis precisely provides for the tenuous nature of the crime of danger. But what if serious damage is caused? In this case, the aforementioned articles apply. 582 and 583 (in the part considered in art. 571) and also in the event of death, if the expiry date escapes the nurse, what we will see in the case of manslaughter will apply<\/p>\n

continue on :\u00a0http:\/\/www.nurse24.it\/reati-infermieristici-depenalizzati-dal-governo-renzi\/#ixzz3N7mTLctX<\/a>
\nhttp:\/\/www.nurse24.it
\nFollow us:\u00a0@nurse24it on Twitter<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0nurse24.it on Facebook<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

The hoax of the decriminalization of crimes by the Renzi government<\/span><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n
\n

As often happens, on the "decriminalization" of crimes carried out by the Government we read confused news, half-truths and hoaxes in industrial quantities. Let's try to clarify a bit.<\/h2>\n

December 29, 2014 \u2013 fanpage.it<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"This piece starts from the end, i.e. from the landing on\u00a0Beppe Grillo's blog of the \u201csemi-buffalo\u201d<\/a>\u00a0(we honestly don't know what to call this type of pseudo news, with half a basis of truth and with an evolution that often overflows into sensationalism). We are talking about the sensational (but also not) decriminalization of 112 (?) crimes by the Renzi government, an issue which after a few passages on the "counter-information" sites (vabbeh), was taken up by Grillo's blog with an intervention by the national secretary of Consap Giorgio Innocenzi.<\/p>\n

The policeman refers to the fact that "a manslaughter, theft, beatings, the abuse of an animal, fraud, obscene acts, or a failure to help even done before our eyes can no longer be subject to criminal conviction" and comes to quote Sciascia (vabbeh \/ 2): \u201cItaly, anything but the cradle of law. It is its coffin!\u201d. It is also singular to underline how after the scandalized tones, in closing it should be noted that it is true that "these are crimes that are not very serious" and it is underlined how the measure "will cause the perception of safety among good people to drop below zero, and will instead splash the perception of getting away with it on the part of those who are not so good". In short, a classic case of the expectation effect, a problem more of "perception" than real, to which Consap himself ends up contributing in an almost paradoxical way.<\/p>\n

But what is the starting point of this new security alarm?<\/strong>\u00a0It all starts from\u00a0law number 67 of 28 April 2014<\/a>, that is to say "delegation to the Government on non-prison prison sentences and the reform of the sanctioning system, with provisions on the suspension of proceedings with probation and against untraceable persons<\/em>\u201d. The law passed definitively in the House with the\u00a0only a vote against by Lega Nord and Movimento 5 Stelle<\/a>\u00a0(while Forza Italia was split into three, for, against and abstained) and contained a series of indications regarding the modification of the assignment of house arrest (which becomes the main penalty for crimes up to 3 years), the assignment of alternative forms to prison such as probation and hourly detention, as well as the "transformation into simple administrative offences" of a series of crimes. Among these also the crime of clandestine immigration, a rule on which it was\u00a0the base of the M5S is also positively expressed<\/a>\u00a0via online voting.<\/p>\n

Being an enabling law, however, there was the need to wait for the legislative decrees<\/strong>, which were finally approved by\u00a0Council of Ministers of 1 December 2014<\/a>. On that occasion, acknowledging the work of the ministerial commission appointed in May and chaired by Professor Palazzo, the CDM gave the go-ahead\u00a0Also<\/em>\u00a0to further provisions for "the non-punishability due to the particular tenuousness of the fact". In a nutshell, it is a question of allowing "a more rapid definition, with an archiving decree or with an acquittal sentence, of the proceedings initiated against persons who have committed criminal offenses characterized by an overall tenuousness of the fact", avoiding that it continues the process "where the penal sanction is not necessary"; on the other hand, the possibility "for the offended persons, to obtain serious and adequate relief in the competent civil office" remains unchanged.<\/p>\n

However, the two things, the "tenuousness" of the fact and the transformation of a series of criminal offenses into administrative offences, are not necessarily connected.<\/strong>\u00a0In the first case we are dealing with criminal offenses, with\u00a0the filing that will be able to trigger<\/a>\u00a0(at each stage of the proceedings)"for all crimes sanctioned with a prison sentence not exceeding a maximum of 5 years or with a pecuniary sanction, provided alone or in addition to prison<\/em>\u201d, but only in the event that the judge deems the fact \u201cirrelevant\u201d or the conduct of \u201cparticularly tenuous\u201d: in short, it is not a safe conduct for those who commit crimes punishable up to 5 years. To be clearer: there is no decriminalization of crimes such as stalking, private violence, abuse of minors (as well as we read somewhere); but it will be the judge who "listen to the parties" will assess whether there is a "particular tenuity" in the crime committed.<\/p>\n

A parenthesis should then be opened on the question of "animal abuse"<\/strong>. In this case, in fact, there is the risk of a short circuit with respect to the Government's idea, since, as it cannot necessarily "listen to the injured party", the judge's decision could be biased in favor of the 'defendant. On this point, as confirmed by Minister Orlando, the Government has reserved the right to intervene again.<\/p>\n

Then there are some crimes that have been transformed into administrative offences<\/strong>, as already anticipated by the enabling law approved in April (in short, if there really was to be a controversy, it had to be done months ago\u2026). It is the reform of the disciplinary discipline, dealt with by article 2 of the enabling law, which precisely provides for the transformation of a series of crimes into administrative offenses (even "regardless" of any conviction). Among them, those for whom it is\u00a0already planned<\/em>\u00a0the sole penalty of the fine,\u00a0except<\/em>\u00a0for crimes involving:<\/p>\n