{"id":68730,"date":"2022-11-15T12:49:25","date_gmt":"2022-11-15T11:49:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/?p=68730"},"modified":"2022-11-29T11:54:46","modified_gmt":"2022-11-29T10:54:46","slug":"danno-da-straining-lazienda-deve-risarcire-linformatore-scientifico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fedaiisf.it\/en\/danno-da-straining-lazienda-deve-risarcire-linformatore-scientifico\/","title":{"rendered":"Cassation. Damage from straining, the company must compensate the scientific rep. It is wrong to believe that scientific reps are subject to marketing management and commercial reasons"},"content":{"rendered":"

With the'<\/strong>ordinance no. 33428 of 11 November 2022<\/a> the Court of Cassation intervenes on the subject of worker stress<\/strong>, placing the compensation on the company.<\/p>\n

published \u2013 November 14, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n

Let's see the terms of the question.<\/p>\n

\"\"THE CASE<\/p>\n

The case starts from a appeal brought by a scientific informant against a sentence of the Court of Appeal of Genoa which<\/strong>, reforming the provisions of the court of La Spezia, had denied the same the damages for serious demotion<\/a><\/strong> (in particular, the appellant had contested the commercial promotion of the products, alongside that of scientific information) and bullying<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The court ruling<\/h2>\n

The court of La Spezia, in fact<\/strong>having ascertained the serious demotion and mobbing behavior to which the worker had been subjected, had sentenced the company to pay compensation for the biological damage<\/strong> temporary and permanent, damage to personal and professional dignity and image<\/strong>, as well as the medical expenses incurred<\/strong> due to the events alleged.<\/p>\n

The judgment of the Court of Appeal<\/h2>\n

In reform of the provisions of the judge of first instance, the Court of Appeal found that:<\/p>\n