As far as “merit” is concerned, here too we have very little to rejoice about.
– Devastating principles are introduced, such as that of allowing (albeit on a transitory basis and subject to the approval of a specific Commission) that pejorative agreements are established at company level with respect to the Contract itself.
– Apprenticeship is introduced, even for FSIs, without taking into account that it is impossible due to current regulations, it is impracticable for relations with Doctors, it is unacceptable because it would dramatically increase the risks and responsibilities of the FSIs who will act as Tutors, and lastly it does not consider that the apprentice is NOT an INFORMER, therefore NOT able to provide information, but must always and only accompany a FSI (the only one, by law, authorized to provide information).
– What was closest to the heart of the ISFs and to which their delegates were aiming, i.e. the incorporation ALSO in the CCNL of a professional profile and a definition of role that was compliant with current regulations (all the regulations!), was postponed and assigned to an Observatory (the profile and classification) and to a specific Commission (yet another!) for the role.
– The "training" using 1.5 days of our ROL, compared to an equivalent period employed by the Companies, MAY only take place in the face of a SUPPLEMENTARY training course, compared to that already done by the Companies, and above all only if it will be agreed with the RSU. No deal = no training using our ROL. (at least in this the action of the RSU and the delegates prevailed…).
There are positive aspects in Fonchim, with a share of 0.20% paid by the company, for predecease and disability, and in Faschim
Good result on "Rights", with an increase in the salary and job retention period, compared to what has been foreseen up to now, in the face of serious and disabling illnesses and accidents.
Economic aspect:
From May 2006 for B1s: 54 euro increase (45 minimum contract + 9 for IPO).
Having said that, the Association, adopting the observations and proposals of the ISF, believes that the hypothesis of this contract should be REJECTED by the workers in the next trade union meetings which will be convened in this regard.
