We receive and publish
I write about the article “ANAC. Anti-corruption officers convicted or under judicial investigation", Published on fedaiisf.it and with your signature, to represent you that, as specified in the clarification signed by the President of the Canton, published in the paper version of yesterday's edition of Corriere della Sera, in the newspaper site and onhome page of the Authority itself, those responsible for the prevention of corruption are not employees of Anac nor can they be traced back to it in any way, since they are managers appointed by the public administrations to which they belong and to which they are required to answer for their work.
It follows that defining them as "ANAC Managers", as already denied, stating that "if this is ANAC, it is not at all surprising that Italy is the most corrupt country in Europe" and above all that the journalistic investigation "reveals certain aspects of the ANAC”, is erroneous and seriously damaging to the Authority's image.
I therefore hereby ask you, as I did yesterday through the "Contacts" section of the site, to remove as soon as possible from the aforementioned article, in the title and in the body of the text, any reference to the National Anti-Corruption Authority that is not factually found.
Sure of your cooperation, I wish you a good day.
Sincerely
Ed.: We gladly take note of the clarifications and of the extraneousness of the ANAC in the cases indicated by Gabanelli in the Corriere della Sera. We fully agree with the Canton President when he states that "However, it is fair to remember that there are at least 15,000 administrations required to appoint a PRC.
There can certainly be bad apples (and there have even been cases of arrests of Rpc) but it should also be highlighted that there are many who are trying to win a very difficult challenge; that of imposing anti-corruption values from within, without waiting for investigations, handcuffs and agents provocateurs“.
We have therefore "corrected" the reported inaccuracies.
Nonetheless, our opinion on the ANAC Code with regard to the ISFs does not change. We had requested a meeting with ANAC to explain our position and to help ANAC adopt even more incisive guidelines on the prevention of corruption in the pharmaceutical industry. Our trust in ANAC was total.
When we met some "advisers" of the ANAC, we warned them, telling them that with those guidelines for the prevention of corruption they blocked the ISF and paved the way for a whole series of unidentified figures whose existence they did not even know . They didn't even bother to figure out what a sector they were trying to regulate looks like.
Consider that those guidelines have produced aberrant results. For example, at the Parma hospital, in order to see a doctor, a written application had to be submitted which had to be evaluated by as many as seven different offices of the various hospital hierarchies. Impossible to predict times and plan any work activity to then obtain, who knows when, an appointment at a time when the doctor had already left the hospital for the end of his service. A mockery! And green light to the corruptors.
We think these measures are erroneous and seriously harmful to us, to our dignity and to our work.
It is necessary to think of the rules “without the prejudice of the crime. The rules are made to measure for a country and honest businesses, they are not made thinking only of the corrupt”.
