I don't know who I'm talking to, and not knowing who I'm writing to is not a good thing, especially among professionals.
But feeling pulled into question by the anonymous colleague Cassandro, who publishes on the site www.informatori.it, I gladly intervene, avoiding the controversies that I instead read in your letter "The bearers of the truth", to express ideas, certainly different, but probably also shared by many readers of both sites.
I disagree for example when the anonymous colleague writes:
“Banging against those who pursue a noble objective such as that of the cultural growth of a category can, in my view, have only two objectives. 1- Silence an uncontrolled or enslaved form of freedom, or 2- to bend those who are not aligned to their own logic;”
I didn't "hurt" myself against anyone, much less towards those who pursue noble goals, I have possibly complained about a serious and ambiguous situation, which continues to discredit the entire category.
Nothing more false when he says, “ to bend those who are not aligned to their own logic ”
This is certainly not our goal, if anything it is Cassandro's goal, because by expressing himself in this way, on the contrary, he would like to bridle those who courageously express their thoughts openly and freely, and spend themselves for a common cause by declaring their name and surname, and not invented names for fear of being discovered.
Unless you have to hide something.
And if so, is this the best way to proceed in the search for unity and associative culture?
I am convinced that Scientific Representatives prefer to deal directly and openly with colleagues they know, without wasting time with disquisitions, false problems, false jealousies and opaque facts that have been well known to us for some time.
Prepend to the desire for category unification, phrases such as:
“It is evident that our category is not accustomed to democratic confrontation. Unfortunately, many are unable to escape the temptation to feel like bearers of the truth. “
it's still:
“Unfortunately I am sad to note that instead of dedicating themselves to the heart of the problems there are those who are still concerned with the aesthetic side d
